Why Android no longer needs a new version every year

Starting with version 9 Pie, Google releases a new major Android update every year between August and September. And work on the developer preview of the next version begins in about six months. In reality, the situation is even more complicated, since there are also quarterly releases of the platform. Theoretically quarterly intermediate releases between major releases. Every year we see discussions about how Android is constantly improving. But in this article, we will discuss whether these annual updates are really necessary anymore.

Don't need a new Android every year?

Android statue

Google updates more often than Apple. It also releases its new iPhones in September along with the new iOS every year. The problem is that comparing the two operating systems makes sense from a media perspective. It makes almost no sense.

Because Google has a distributed strategy, Android, unlike iOS, requires fewer and fewer operating system updates to provide users with new features. Regardless of the user's smartphone brand or Android version, Google's goal with project treble is to update as many components as possible via the Play Store/Play Services for as many users as possible at the same time.

In iOS, things are different, and sometimes updating some apps and features requires you to update the operating system as well. Consider the dynamic island of the iPhone 14. To see how often new iPhones actually require a new operating system. Apple produces both hardware and software, and the former is made taking into account the features of the latter.

In short, going after Apple like this is absurd because the motivations of the Cupertino company are different from those of Google and Android.

Because Android is so versatile, it's great. There are so many different manufacturers (Samsung obviously sells most of them). And each of them has a unique interface that aims to improve Android. Or otherwise make it more unique to your users. Unfortunately, it's becoming increasingly difficult for various OEMs to keep up with updates. Especially since Google annually updates the operating system.

Third-party manufacturers are lagging behind

In fact, there isn't much time left between one major Android release and the next. And there is not enough time for third-party manufacturers to step in and add something new to its interfaces. At most, it will do so during the release of the next version of the OS, but adding additional new features (in addition to those that Google has proposed and which then have to be implemented or not) easily leads to delays that the most dedicated users will not like.

In short, MIUI, One UI, Color OS, etc. have become less dynamic than before. This is explained, in particular, by the fact that they have to keep up with the fast pace. In order to release a new version of Android every year. Which often makes changes that may have already been present for some time in the user interface.

Don't get me wrong; updates are important, especially security updates that add another brick to the protection of every smartphone. With this in mind, the need to run Android 13. Which in the eyes of users is only 12.1. And it makes no sense to force different manufacturers to update as quickly as possible.

And the same argument can be made for Wear OS as well. Which has a more complicated history than Android, but has recently received an update.

Враховуючи успіх Apple Watch, можливо, варто приділити більше уваги новим версіям. Але це не обов’язково означає, що вони повинні стати щорічними. Google має прийняти новий більш достатній метод для оновлень.

What's your reaction?
Cool
2
Cool
Happy
0
Happy
Shaking
0
Shaking
Interesting
0
Interesting
Sad
0
Sad
Angry
0
Angry
Read Gizchina on Google News

Did you like the article? Thanks to the editors!

Source
Share with friends
Rate the author
(There are no ratings yet)
GizChina.Com.Ua

Why does Android no longer need a new version every hour?

Starting with version 9 Pie, Google releases a new Android update every year from August to September. And work on the developer preview of the next version starts in about six months. In fact, the situation is even more complicated, since there are also quarterly releases of the platform. Theoretically quarterly intermediate releases between the main releases. Every hour we see discussions about how Android is constantly being improved. But in this article we will discuss whether these annual updates are really necessary.

Don't need a new Android every hour?

Android statue

Google updates more often than Apple. It also releases its new iPhones in September along with new iOS every hour. The problem is that comparing two operating systems makes sense from the point of view of the media. It is practically meaningless.

Since Google has a distributed strategy, Android, unlike iOS, requires less and less updated operating systems to provide users with new functions. Regardless of the user's smartphone brand or Android version, Google's goal with project treble is to update as many components as possible through the Play Store/Play Services for the maximum number of users at the same time.

In iOS, everything is different, and sometimes in order to update some applications and functions, you also need to update the operating system. Consider the dynamic island of the iPhone 14. To see how often new iPhones really require a new operating system. Apple produces both hardware and software, and the first is made taking into account the features of the second.

In short, chasing Apple in this way is absurd, because the motivation of the Cupertino company is different from the motivation of Google and Android.

Because Android is so versatile, it's great. There are so many different manufacturers (Samsung obviously sells most of them). And each of them has a unique interface aimed at improving Android. Or otherwise make it more unique for its users. Unfortunately, it is becoming increasingly difficult for various OEMs to keep up with updates. Especially since Google annually updates the operating system.

Third-party manufacturers lag behind

In fact, there is little time left between one major Android release and the next. And there is not enough time for third-party manufacturers to intervene and add something new to its interfaces. Moreover, it will do this when the next version of the OS is released, but adding additional new features (in addition to those that Google has proposed, and which should then be implemented or not) easily leads to delays that the most dedicated users will not like.

In a word, MIUI, One UI, Color OS, etc. have become less dynamic than before. This is explained, in particular, by the fact that they have to keep up with the fast pace. In order to release a new version of Android every hour. Kotoraya often makes changes that may have been present for some time in the user interface.

Don't get me wrong; Updates are important, especially security updates that add another layer of protection to every smartphone. Considering this, it is necessary to run Android 13. Which in the eyes of users is only 12.1. And they will force different manufacturers to update as soon as possible, there is no sense.

And the same argument can be made with Wear OS as well. Which has a more complicated history than Android, but recently received an update.

Given the success of the Apple Watch, perhaps more attention should be paid to new versions. But this does not necessarily mean that they should become annual. Google should adopt a new, more adequate method for updates.

What's your reaction?
Cool
1
Cool
Happy
1
Happy
Shaking
0
Shaking
Interesting
0
Interesting
Sad
0
Sad
Angry
0
Angry
Read Gizchina on Google News

Did you like the article? Thanks to the editors!

Source
Share with friends
Rate the author
(There are no ratings yet)
GizChina.Com.Ua